Some people may argue that we need to understand the past to solve the problems of the present or the future. However, I have a different idea. I think that understanding the past to solve the problems don’t help to prepare present or future.
To begin with, it is not necessary to understand our ancestors in order to make a good future because there are different environments. The world is changing more and more rapidly and our ancestors would have experienced great different problems than ours. For example, when my father was in university, my father’s best problem protested against the government because the president in that time was dictator. However, I always worry about getting a good job during the college’s years. This example shows that our ancestors problems is different with our problem, so the problems should not help our future.
In addition, our ancestors’ problem solving is outdate and then our generation don’t consider their method because our generation will not be able to fine interested in old ways. Not only that, development of technology makes it easier to find out information what we need to lean. There is no longer meaning to learn information in the past. For instance, Gallup Korea conducted a survey which supports this idea. They asked a group of opinion leader how much they refer to issues in the past for problem’s solution here. According to result, vast majority of the respondents answered that there is no reference. Therefore, I strongly believe that our ancestors’ solutions are useless to our generation.
As mentioned above, I disagreed that we need to understand the past to solve the problems of the present or the future. It is because environment in problems are different with our and we are not interested in old solution.
=====================================
Some people may argue that we need to understand the past to solve the problems of the present or the future. However, I have a different idea. I think that understanding the past to solve the problems don’t help to prepare for the present or the future.
To begin with, it is not necessary to understand our ancestors in order to make have a good future because there are different environments they are two different periods of time. The world is changing more and more rapidly and our ancestors would have experienced great different problems than from ours us. For example, when my father was in university, my father’s best worst problem experience was when he joined in the protest protested against the government because the president in during that time was a dictator. However, I always worry about getting a good job during the my college’s years. This example shows that our ancestors’ problems is are different with our problem from ours, so the problems should not help our future past will not be able to help us in the future.
In addition, our ancestors’ problem solving is outdate outdated and then our my generation don’t doesn’t consider their method because our generation will not be able to fine be interested in the old ways. Not only that, the development of technology makes it easier to find out information what that we need to lean. There is no longer meaning to learn learning information in the past. For instance, In fact, Gallup Korea conducted a survey which supports this idea. They asked a group of opinion leaders how much they refer to issues in the past for problem’s solution here to solve current problems. According to the result, vast majority of the respondents answered that there is no reference. Therefore, I strongly believe that our ancestors’ solutions are useless to our generation.
As mentioned above, I disagreed that we need to understand the past to solve the problems of the present or the future. It is because environment in problems are different with our and we are not interested in old solution our ancestors’ situations were different from ours and we are not interested in following the old methods of dealing with problems.
file_01.zip